Applying for the Pylon Community Fund

Pylon encourages active community involvement, driving DeFi and yield redirection adoption where users continuously build on top of the protocol. This document aims to outline a community spending framework for applying for community grants and third-party Pylon SDK integrations.


Pylon holds a store of MINE tokens in the community fund as a reserve to be used for the enhancement and empowerment of its ecosystem and community. The following document will provide frameworks that take the best practices from existing governance procedures.

Drawing from the framework of previous Terra projects, there will be two types of grants that users and project teams can fill out: Ecosystem Development grants and Ecosystem Contributor grants .

Ecosystem Development Grants

The purpose of grants is to empower ecosystem teams to build necessary tools and infrastructure that are not provided at the launch of the protocol. Projects that are value additive to the protocol and/or make user experience better such as the creation of new smart contract applications that enable greater access across more markets or dashboards and other tools for managing their assets on Pylon Protocol are eligible for community grant funding.

When making an ecosystem grant proposal, the following major criteria should be adequately described.

  • Relation of the proposal to Pylon Protocol
  • Benefit and impact towards Pylon Protocol and Pylon community
  • Status of the project (is it in a vague ideation stage or already in production)
  • Profile of team and likeliness to deliver by the described deadline
  • Potential of the proposal (viability, longevity, competition, uniqueness, accessibility, etc)
  • Breakdown of costs (detailed breakdown of the usage of the funds for the proposed project)

Note that the descriptions are intentionally quite vague as the funds are meant to be quite flexible. Existing and completed projects are also eligible to submit proposals for funding if they can demonstrate the accumulated benefits to the ecosystem.

Grants in this category should roughly fall in the range of $1000 to $30,000 worth of MINE tokens.

Ecosystem Contributor Grants

Community grants are aimed at rewarding outstanding users that have significantly contributed to the improvement of the Pylon Protocol community. This category includes users that may have played important roles in shaping the outcomes of Pylon Protocol community decisions, contributed to improving the general level of understanding in the Pylon Protocol community, created content relating to Pylon Protocol, or helped out other community members.

Grants in this category should roughly fall in the range of $100 to $1000 worth of MINE tokens.

Community Pool Spend Proposal Evaluation Form

Evaluative Questions

  1. Feasibility - Does the project qualification match the current bandwidth and needs of Pylon?
  2. Dependencies - Does this project rely on other projects or does it potentially interfere with other projects?
  3. Slack - How does the project equilibrium look like once the project grows in size? What is the scope creep risk?
  4. Feedback - Does the suggested project have sufficient feedback or is more discussion required?
  5. Promotion - What is the plan to grow the project and how will the project engage internally within the community and externally?
  6. Resourcing - Which external parties are required to engage with this project (ex. Terraform Labs, Cosmos, etc.)?
  7. Maintenance - Are there maintenance issues? If so, who will maintain the project, and what is the cost associated with doing so?
  8. Skills - Does the project proposer have the required skills and background to be able to successfully carry out the project? Does he/she have a portfolio to cross-reference or evidence to demonstrate capability?
  9. Realistic - Are the project and the plan to execute expedient and realizable within the proposed timeframe?

Required Heuristics

  1. Deliverables Set - A short deck about the project and/or an MVP of a technical product wrapped into a realistic timeline
  2. Budget - The budget should be clear upfront with specific hours or values. Ranges should be avoided. Additional planned proposals for further funding should be also specified if possible.

Why is this being disregarded for Pylonboard? Why is there currently a vote on a grant for a further 58,600 UST after an initial grant of 30,000 UST? Is the above guideline disregarded in the case of anyone who has a close relationship with @limowooj ?